Tuesday, December 16, 2008
What a semester!!!
Claudia
Baby?
Thank you all for the fun semester ... have a great holiday and please keep in touch!
Monday, December 15, 2008
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Where we turn in our paper
Paper
Thanks guys.
-Gina
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Final essay
Monday, December 8, 2008
Essay peer edit
Thanks,
Jeff Joh
Sunday, December 7, 2008
A Note on Plagiarism
My department has asked me, given that it's the end of the semester and final papers are coming near, to send out a general announcement about plagiarism. I spoke briefly about this at the beginning of the semester, but to reiterate: plagiarism is generally prohibited in Berkeley classes and in this one is grounds for failure. For our purposes, plagiarism consists of the unattributed use of another author's work, or the presentation of another author's work as one's own. A good rule of thumb is that if you think it might be plagiarism, it probably is. Thus all of the following count as plagiarism:
1. Directly quoting another person's actual words, whether oral or written, without citation (quotation marks and indication of source text).
2. Using another person's ideas, opinions, or theories, without citation (indication of source text).
3. Paraphrasing the words, ideas, opinions, or theories of others, whether oral or written, without citation.
If you are wondering if your paper, or parts of your paper, may be plagiarized, there are services available, such as EssayRater, that one can use to assess the occurrence of plagiarism in one's paper. Plagiarism.org is a good site for learning more about what constitutes plagiarism and how to avoid it.
Please keep all of this in mind as you work on your final papers. If you have any questions, feel free to check out one of the above sites or to e-mail me.
Best,
Ben
Blow-up Music
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Propeller scene in Blow-up
In fact, why does he like buying stuff so much, like why did he want to buy that painting from Bill? And why does he want to buy that antique shop? Is it just to show that he's rich, or is there some other meaning behind that?
Jeff Joh
Citing A Room of One's Own?
Thanks
Tom
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Writing Analytically 7.2
Writing Analytically, 7.2
1. Pros : The transition into the thesis statement is good, summing up the
two arguments being made in. Uses the word “despite” and “while” to set up
a typically good thesis structure. Presents the specific dilemma
accurately and concisely.
Cons: Makes no claim, nothing that needs to be further proved. Uses a lot
of nouns rather than verbs, no direction. Sums up the introductory
paragraph, doesn’t truly provide a compelling argument. It’s basically a
statement of fact. The first part of the sentence says “despite both
legitimate claims,…” however the second part is just reiterating the two
legitimate claims.
While both claims are legitimate, the issue of protecting the environment
will long outlive the problems of our current economy, but maintaining a
proper balance to both is key a successful future.
2. Pros: It makes a claim. Presents its argument clearly, introduces the
subject of the argument in the very beginning, uses “corporate view” to
try to seem like it is not a personal opinion.
Cons: It is, however, obviously a personal statement, based completely off
of the female stereotype in society. The beginning phrase is unnecessary
(“Regarding the….”), overall sentence is convoluted. “Losing the race”
isn’t quite the best phrase of choice.
As powerful firms promote people into top executive positions, gender
stereotypes are being used against women, claiming that a woman’s
compassion makes her less of a candidate.
Monday, December 1, 2008
Writing Analytically 7.2
Despite the concerns over preventing global warming, industries must expand to stimulate the American economy.
2. This thesis seems to have personal conviction in the claim. The claim puts women behind men in a corporate “race,” and assumes that executive positions require a lack of compassion. The thesis has a point, but is weakened in its wordiness and weak verbs. To "keep up" with competition is vague, and does not make a specific claim. Overall, the thesis seems more like an attack on women than an analysis.
Women are less likely to gain executive positions, because corporations believe that women are too compassionate to uphold the corporations' interests.
Writing Analytically, 7.2
1.
Strengths:
- anticipates objections by stating both sides and claims that they are both “legitimate”
- good sentence structure: starts out with “despite” and follows argument with “while”
- is relatively specific and avoids weak verbs
Weaknesses:
- somewhat wrong use of “despite”
- lacks drive: the use of “critical” remains ambiguous
- so what if it is “critical”?
Thesis rewrite:
Although protecting the environment and securing our country’s economic position are both legitimate claims, we need to intertwine both objectives because forsaking one for the other will result in useless efforts.
2.
Strengths:
- sets up argument well with points that readers will expect to find out about later
Weaknesses:
- awkward flow (especially the first sentence)
- wordy, non-specific words
Thesis rewrite:
Because most corporations consider women to be too compassionate to keep up with the competition within a firm, women are less likely to hold executive positions.
The Lover/Essay Question
p91
"It was as night ended that he killed himself, in the main square, glittering with light."
I seem to be missing something... who is dying here?
Please any help would be awesome!
-Zach
Writing Analytically 7.2
1. The thesis states the obvious and has no compelling argument
2. "Critical" is too braod of a term
3. The thesis statement does not predicate
Although there exists these two established claims, the challenge of protecting the environment while simultaneously satisfying the economy remains the ultimate objective.
Question 2
1. There is a lot of weak verb use
2. There are a lot of generalizations such as "race"
3. The verbs are not strong enough to support the nouns and make for a strong statement
The corporate stereotype, in which women are viewed as too sensitive and compassionate to succeed in a competitive firm, hinders the number of women promoted into executive positions.